Obama 'fund raising' for Hillary Clinton?



Fund raising?  For Hillary Clinton who has millions if not billions in their Clinton Foundation account, reported to be bribe monies they received to provide secrets and services to the enemies of this nation?!

Gerry Urbanek 
July 29, 2016 at 7:19am


In a rather unprecedented move for a 'sitting' 'president', Barack Obama has announced he will be clearing his schedule for the entire month of October in order to campaign for Hillary Clinton, the New York Times reported.   (Obama AND Biden are supposed to have 'resigned' last fall by 'encouragement' - and no longer occupy the offices of 'president' nor 'vice president', nor has any power or authority with or on behalf of the cabal U.S.A. corporation?  Just 'fronting' so everything appears to be 'normal'?? Are we continuing to be LIED to about the restoration of the republic government of our nation?)

Short of a major crisis (now there's something important to consider possibly happening - since they don't let a 'crisis' go to waste), the 'president' plans to aggressively campaign for the Democratic 'nominee' (Clinton having once again received the position via FRAUD) and will likely be on the campaign trail almost daily, all the way up to 'Election' Day. (Here's yet another sad joke for us - 'election'? Is that what they call VOTE MANIPULATION, likely by the Soro's enterprises, to ensure that Hillary 'wins.')

The announcement has already begun drawing criticism from those who believe the job of the 'president' (of a private corporation pretending to be the government of our nation) is to run the country (run it in to the ground), not fund raise and campaign for your successor. (Since it has been reported that Obama is no longer the private corporation's 'president', and that Paul Ryan is now 'running the nation,' as Hillary would say: "What difference does it make?!')

According to some of Obama’s closest advisers, however, the 'president' has become extremely concerned that a Trump presidency would spell disaster for his 'legacy'.  (Obama has ALREADY accomplished that feat all by himself. How many more traitorous crimes does he need to commit in the next 2 to 3 months to reach his goal?)

Using the power of the Oval Office, Obama fears Trump will overturn his executive amnesty, the Affordable Care Act, reimpose abortion restrictions at home and abroad, and shift the American foreign policy focus.

In addition, the 'president' fears Trump will lift EPA regulations on coal, begin the construction of a wall on the U.S. border with Mexico, and halt immigration from countries with high instances of terrorism.  (We can only hope and pray and pressure any new government employees to do these very things. Unless and until our Republic is restored (not a new corporation created in France using the word 'Republic' in its name) - ALL 'laws' by this criminal corporation apply ONLY to them and their employees, and NOT to We the People. It is TIME to get this matter resolved once and for all.)

“I’m sure he [Obama] thinks about that first 100 days the way the rest of us do,” said Dan Pfeiffer, Obama’s former senior adviser. “You wake up every day, and another thing that you and your team worked so hard to do is undone. That would be more painful than the 'president' or any of us can imagine.” (Please dear God - please let this be so. Enough is enough.)

The (former) 'president’s' communications director, Jen Psaki, added the focus right now is how to continue the changes Obama has started.  “There’s been all of this work done, 'progress' made,” she said. “How does this continue? Who his successor is is a big part of that puzzle.” (Again, we must do all we can to put a permanent end to this criminal syndicate in our nation, including arresting and prosecuting all of them to the fullest extent of our common law - doing away with the criminal law of the sea on our lands.)

At least part of the 'president’s' concern stems from the fact that he knows exactly how vulnerable a legacy can be. (Obama's traitorous criminal 'legacy' will go down in the history books for all eternity, along with the Clintons and Bushes.) When Obama took office in 2008, he immediately began winding back the policies of President George W. Bush, especially the ones relating to national security.

(Obama and Clintons have done more to destroy our nation's national security than all the presidents and their staff prior.  No worry - Bushes, Clintons, Obamas, Cheneys, Rumsfields and numerous others are to be arrested and tried for TREASON. What We the People DEMAND now from those who are supposedly working to restore this nation to its rightful Republic is PROOF of these arrests, PROOF of the restoration of our nation's COMMON LAW COURT SYSTEM, PROOF of the restoration of our national Treasury, PROOF of the gold backed currency system, PROOF of the restoration of the rightful Republic, PROOF of the Global Currency Reset being made available to We the People in our nation to be able to exchange our currencies, etc.  WHY the hold up - WHY the hold back?  WHY the CONTINUED and REPEATED lies, delays and excuses?)

Former attorney general Eric Holder, who was instrumental to the Obama administration until his resignation in the face of scandal and controversy, echoed these concerns.  “A substantial part of that progress would be at risk if Trump were to be elected,” he said. “I don’t think there’s any question.”  However, while a “substantial part” of the Obama 'legacy' would be at risk, Holder believes certain (maritime) court rulings and cultural shifts (gay rights, men given free access to women's restrooms, the continual influx of muslim jihadis?) would likely weather the storm.  “I don’t think, however, determined a 'president' might be, you could in essence turn the clock back on those measures,” said Holder, referring to gay marriage.

Whatever the case may be, Obama’s concern over a Trump presidency only further highlights the significance this upcoming election holds for people on both sides of the ideological aisle.

http://www.westernjournalism.com/october-surprise-why-obama-wont-be-spending-much-time-in-white-house/ 

No comments:

Post a Comment