This sudden barrage of "terror attacks" means war is really close
Tuesday, July 19, 2016
Add Comment
This sudden barrage of "terror attacks" means war is really close
July 19 2016
Jim Stone
Now it is axe man in Germany. This is all just a setup for war. Muslims did none of this, all of these attacks are fake as fruit loops and staged by people who want war. Obviously I do not agree with shipping so many ideologically different foreigners into Europe, but I also don't believe these foreigners are that much into causing problems of the type we've been told have happened. From the perspective of the Soros/Clinton type 'elite', if you are going to go to war, you have to make your population hate the people you want to destroy. To do this, you need to make the people you want to destroy look horrible and monstrous, deserving no sympathy at all. You have to make your populations want to endure sacrifice of their way of life, so you can use your population's efforts and abilities to wipe out that enemy. And that enemy does not need to be guilty of anything at all, you just have to make your population base believe they are.
This so-called "sudden outbreak" of terror came on too suddenly to be a reflection of any real reality. It all started happening after it was made legal to lie about anything you want in the media, with no repercussions being returned to you for doing so. It all started happening when people really began to wake up enough to threaten the corrupted power structure. And if you dig into any of it, it all ends up being fake. Staging it all and reporting "terror incidents" that did not happen will be as effective as real life events, if you control the media well enough. And they do.
Even a mushroom ought to be smart enough to know that when it is openly stated that if Hillary gets elected there will be war with Russia, that someone wants war badly, and these types of psy ops are always a prelude to war. The ruling elite need war to stay in power. War is the only thing that will set a precedent for them to put in place social policies that will allow their survival now. Tons of Muslim countries are allies with Russia. War with Russia equals killing Muslims. So you have to demonize Muslims to make your populations agree to setting the stage for war with Russia. If you own the media that can happen without Muslims doing a single thing.
It is starting to look to me like our enemies in the power structure are so afraid of Trump getting elected that they are pulling out all the stops and using the media to front lies in the craziest ways. They want war with Russia so badly they are willing to do practically anything to make it happen, their survival depends on that now, and kicking off war with a slew of Muslim countries that are allied with Russia would be a great way for them to stay out of jail.
In concert with the hard psy ops on the ground, they have agents hit the public sphere to influence people in the forums and blogs to hate Muslims, and milk the most out of their fakery in the media. Anti Muslim rhetoric has to be a key element to kicking off world war 3. No doubt about it, many agents are active online, and by their actions it is obvious ALL OF THEM want war with Russia.Do you? If you do not, hit every forum you know of, target the war mongering "hate Islam" threads with "elect Trump to solve the problem" memes. Yep, electing Trump really will solve the problem, by putting the correct people in jail. Trump will not do war with Russia, and he is not stupid enough to be tricked into it with a back-door "terror" psy op against a 3rd party either. It won't take a war at all to put an end to "Islamic terror", all it will take is for someone like Trump to land the liars in jail. If that happens, you will be surprised by how peaceful the world suddenly becomes.July 16/17/18 2016
I know about the "Baton Rouge shootings" but am staying on the following topic for another day, because it irrevocably proves the truck attack in Nice was 100 percent phony, (and therefore most likely the Baton Rouge shootings are phony.) If we are going to get anywhere on the "terror" topic, people have to see this, have it sink in, and distribute it far and wide. WE NEVER GET ANYTHING AS OBVIOUS AS THIS TO KILL LIES WITH, THEY TOTALLY BLEW IT, ARCHIVE, POST, AND CONVERT THE BLIND OVER TO THE TRUTH.
WRECKING BAR!!!!!!
NOW MORE THAN BULLET STICKERS, THEY USED A FLAT ENDED WRECKING BAR TO POKE "BULLET HOLES" IN THE METAL! ANOTHER BUST!
You can't get a clear picture of the bullet holes in the metal on the truck. I FOUND OUT WHY. It is because they were obviously poked into the metal with a wrecking bar!
ALL OF THESE "BULLET HOLES" IN THE METAL ON THE SIDE OF THE TRUCK ARE NOW PROVEN TO "SUPPOSED TO BE" STRAIGHT ON POINT BLANK SHOTS ACCORDING TO THE "SHOOT OUT" VIDEO. IN THAT VIDEO NOT A SINGLE ONE THAT HIT THE SIDE WAS FIRED FROM THE FRONT OF THE TRUCK. THERE SHOULD NOT BE ANY ELONGATED BULLET HOLES ON THE SIDE OF THE TRUCK. YET, NOT ONLY ARE THEY ELONGATED, THEY ARE ALL RECTANGULAR WITH SQUARE CORNERS. SO EITHER THE POLICE SHOOT RECTANGULAR BULLETS NOW, OR A WRECKING BAR WAS USED, THAT IS THE ONLY WAY THIS HAPPENED, AND IT EXPLAINS PERFECTLY WHY YOU CAN'T FIND ANY CRYSTAL CLEAR BULLET PICTURES OF THE SIDE OF THIS TRUCK ANYWHERE. IT ALSO EXPLAINS WHY THERE ARE NO EXIT HOLES. Despite the censorship, someone managed to get a picture of the holes that was good enough even if it was not "crystal clear".
Obvious problems with the Nice terror attack:1. None of the video shows the truck actually hit anyone.2. They lied about the truck going through barricades and into a "people only" area. The truck only goes down a street with existing traffic, where if people are watching out like they should, they would not get hit. And it was not going fast at all, like it would be on a death mission. The death toll could not have been this high. If he was lucky, he would have hit only one or two people even if he went full speed through red light crosswalks which were never mentioned in the MSM.
3. There is no police shoot out video, despite what claims are. Police simply approach the side of the truck that has no "bullet holes" and go around it. There is no scene at all of them shooting the glass, or putting a single bullet hole in the truck. There is only sound, which could be dubbed in and no glass fragments flying, no holes appearing, NOTHING. All "holes" appear at angles the camera never gets live, despite the fact that the camera followed the police in! This would be done if you used bullet stickers, and had pre existing holes in the cab, on the OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE TRUCK already in place for the still cameras later that the video camera could not ever see because if they were there before the police arrived, it would prove it all fake. We are just supposed to believe this camera guy stayed in the line of fire as the police shot towards him, from the side of the cab you can't see, after they went around it ON THE SAME VIDEO.
When I first heard of this story, I made a few assumptions that were wrong. I assumed the truck swerved and hit people. That was wrong, despite the fact they said it. I assumed the truck went into an area that was blocked off for pedestrians only, down a path way that only people were supposed to be on. I BELIEVED THAT WAS THE STORY, BECAUSE THEY SAID SO. THAT WAS WRONG, IT WAS JUST ON A NORMAL STREET THAT WAS NOT BLOCKED OFF AT ALL.
The entire pretext for this story is so fake it could not possibly happen. It would not be possible to go down any street that is allowing normal traffic, and hit more than a couple people even if you tried. People are not stupid, they have brains and eyballs and ears, and are a moving target. The truck is loud. You can't sneak up on anyone at 40 mph and just bash them. It is not fast enough for surprise, or slow enough for the truck to be quiet. This truck did not go on a rampage through a deaf club. And the videos show that even if the truck was speeding, it was going close to the normal speed limit for the street on top of that! If the truck was not jumping the curbs and bashing barricades, the entire story is BULLSHIT.
I WAITED TO SAY THIS UNTIL IT COULD BE ABSOLUTELY PROVEN: NO BULLETS WERE EVER FIRED AT THE TRUCK.
Have any doubt they used bullet stickers? The image I used to prove it came from HERE All people need to do to bust this psy op is think about what was put right in front of everyone.UPDATE: DO NOT MISS THE NEW BULLET STICKER SET GRAPHIC. IT IS PLACED BELOW THE PICTURES OF THE TRUCK. THEY USED SET NUMBER 3 ON THE WINDOWS.
TAKE A LOOK AT THIS AND EXPLAIN IT! IN THE SECOND PICTURE, THE CAMERA ANGLE CAUGHT THE GLARE OFF THE SURFACE OF ONE OF THE BULLET STICKERS, AND THE GLARE WENT RIGHT ACROSS THE "BULLET HOLE!"
HERE ARE THE BULLET STICKER SETS. I FOUND THE ACTUAL SET. THEY USED THE "HOLLYWOOD" BULLET STICKERS THAT ARE IN THE BOTTOM SET FOR THE WINDOWS ON THE TRUCK.
Bandog surprised me with his message, where he still believed the bullet holes were real. But when you compare the windshield holes in THIS PICTURE and match them up with hollywood bullet set #3, MY GOSH WE HAVE A MATCH!UPDATE: THE NEXT DAY THEY SMASHED THE WINDSHIELD, BECAUSE PEOPLE POINTED OUT THE LACK OF CRACKS. DO NOT BE FOOLED BY THIS, THE TRUCK PHOTOS ABOVE SHOW HOW IT REALLY WAS, WITH PERFECT CLARITY.
MORAL OF THE STORY: WHEN USING WINDOW STICKERS FOR A PSY OP, BE CAREFUL OF CAMERA ANGLES AND NEVER TAKE A PICTURE WHEN THERE IS GLARE ACROSS ONE OF THE STICKERS.
. July 15 2016UPDATE: The truck driver rampage in France story has multiple gaping holes which I will briefly mention here: 1. No second party cell phone coverage despite 40,000 people present. Also nothing from people on balconies who were far enough away from the action to cover it with real cameras. 2. No first responders, relatives or anyone else with the dead bodies more than a half hour after the carnage started, with the truck sitting there with windows shot. NO FIRST RESPONDERS FOR OVER A HALF HOUR? NO POLICE MOB? EVEN LONG AFTER EVERYTHING WAS COMPLETELY SECURED? Just photo op bodies laying there. YEP. STAR WARS HAPPENED. It looked so real. I never saw an ambulance in Star Wars either.
SORRY- breaking the window on the next day to support the hoax won't cut it when the cracks are not consistent with the "bullet holes"!
Compare the bullet holes in the windshield to the "hollywood" set above. Note: Though the windshield is now cracked, the cracks are not consistent with the bullet holes and instead match up with an apparent sledge hammer hit to the bottom left corner.
IMPORTANT: Look at the hole that I pointed out in the top picture. In this picture below, the camera photographed the bullet sticker properly, so the "hole" is wide open. Some people have pointed out that the orange decal on the upper right hand side of the windshield has a black center in the hole that would not be there if a bullet sticker with a transparent center was used. It has to be a magic marker trick or the correct bullet sticker, because the real damning evidence is what was missed and out of control of the psy op team - the center of the bullet hole that is reflecting in one photo, proving there is no hole, and the other photographs of the same sticker that did not catch glare because of the camera angle, and show it as "wide open". The fact it shows wide open in one shot and has obvious glare in another shot cinches this, stickers were used no if's or buts.
0 Response to "This sudden barrage of "terror attacks" means war is really close"
Post a Comment